Flea power valve amps Those who know me know that I love my flea power single-ended (SE) valve amplifiers. The three valve amps that are in my current rotation are The Silver Dragon - 300B SET, Luciano - 807 SE UL and Paris - SE 6EM7 fully integrated amp. The power output from these amps ranges from 2.5W to 5.8W. With so little available power it is easy to understand why high-sensitivity loudspeakers are required.
I have had a pair of Fostex single driver back-loaded horns for a few years now. The horn speakers use the. The FE206En driver has a rated sensitivity of 96dB/1W/1m. The back loaded horn speakers are large and (according to my wife) ugly speakers. But when it comes to flea power amps they can make 'boogie' real loud. A family friend had built me the and at the same time a pair double bass-reflex boxes also for the Fostex FE206En driver.
The horn speakers I kept for myself but the double bass-reflex speakers went to my son's house along with a two-stage KT88 SE UL amp that I built. Kit, my son, had the FE206En double bass-reflex speakers in the corner of the room on a wood floor.
The bass from these speakers was always very impressive. So much so that I had to have a pair for myself. Photograph 1: First pair Fostex FE206En Double Bass Reflex Speakers Double Bass-Reflex Type Speaker Enclosures The double bass-reflex (DBR) speaker system is a variation of the standard bass-reflex (BR) enclosure that is intended to achieve further extension of the bass response. The augmentation to the bass output is achieved by the use an additional chamber in the bass-reflex process. Other advantages of the double bass-reflex speaker compared to a conventional bass-reflex system are a reduction of the cone excursion around F 3 and a corresponding reduction distortion. The use of an additional chamber in the speaker enclosure also reduces the likelihood of resonances.
The interior chambers of the double bass-reflex speaker box is typically lined with a thick damping material and/or stuffed with loose synthetic or wool fill. The fill material is used to dampen the rear wave from the driver and minimize standing waves and reflections within the speaker enclosure. Fostex FE206En Double Bass-Reflex Speaker Box Plan The double bass-reflex speaker enclosure plan is from the datasheet that was included with the Fostex FE206En driver. Figure 1 below shows the speaker box plan from the datasheet.
Figure 1: Fostex FE206En Double Bass-Reflex Enclosure Plan Fostex FE206En Fullrange Speaker Drivers The photos below show the. I have added bituminous aluminium foil to dampen the driver frame.
The extremely large magnet of the driver is also covered with bitumanized heavy aluminium foil to reduce sound reflections from the back of the box. There are many tweaks and modifications that can be done to improve the drivers. For more ideas, see the page. Photograph 2: Fostex FE206En Fullrange Speaker Drivers Photograph 3: Damping the Frame of Fostex FE206En Fullrange Drivers More than one skill Anyone who has tried a DIY audio project knows that you generally need to know more than how to just read a schematic and use a soldering iron. The skills required can vary from simple drilling holes to complex carpentry. When it comes to carpentry I leave that to those who are better skilled than I.
But I don't shy from timber or metal enclosure preparation and finishing. Photograph 4: Unfinished Fostex FE206En Double Bass-Reflex Speakers Cabinets Luckily when the double bass-reflex speaker boxes arrived they had already been sanded down and that meant I only had to finish the surface preparation with a pass of fine sand paper before applying a coat of primer.
I wanted a dull stipple finish so reflections from the big screen TV from the sides of the speaker boxes would be minimized. To achieve this I used a cheap paint-roller and after going once around the box with a white undercoating paint, I went around three more times with a semi-dry roller to really tease-up that stipple finish.
This process worked out very well. After two hours of drying time I applied the top coat to the speaker boxes. This was a satin finish in black. Not quite black more of a dark charcoal. Once more I went back over each surface three or more times using a semi-dry roller. The stipple finish, which had started with the undercoat, was now built on with the top coat.
That was the finished I had envisaged, dull and heavily stippled. Photograph 5: Painted Fostex FE206En Double Bass Reflex Speakers Cabinets Assembly - Fostex FE206En Double Bass-Reflex Speakers The top chamber of the double bass-reflex speaker boxes is lined (but not stuffed) with Dacron poly fill. The bottom chamber of the speakers remains empty. Photograph 6: Speaker Damping Materials FE206En Double Bass-Reflex Speakers Cabinets Gold plated binding posts are used to connect the speakers at the back. Two strands of wire wrap wire (fine 30 silver plated copper wire) is use for both positive and negative of the speakers. A special pair of single strand wire wrap wire speaker leads was made for the speakers knowing the amp of 2.5W would require no heavier wire.
Photograph 7: Wire Wrap Wire and Speaker Binding Posts In the final assembly steps, most of the slack from the connecting wire (double strains of lightly twisted wire wrap wire) was removed and the drive screwed securely onto the boxes with supplied gasket. The fine metal grills are held on with four rare earth button magnets and are easy to pop on and off. Photograph 8: Fostex FE206En Double Bass Reflex Speakers Photograph 9: Fostex FE206En Double Bass Reflex Speakers No speaker crossover, baffling? The Fostex FE206En drivers are 'fullrange' types and their main appeals is that no crossover is required. The advantage is that there is no crossover distortion or suppression of the dynamics which occurs with almost all passive crossover circuits. Now some builders may opt to use a use a.
You can use the to determine the value of choke and resistor required based on the width of the speaker baffle and impedance of the speaker. The circuit is simple, just one inductor and one resistor in parallel with each other and in series with the speaker. Figure 2 shows typical values for use with this double bass-reflex speaker enclosure. Figure 2: Baffle Step Compensation Circuit - Fostex FE206En Double Bass-Reflex Speaker What the BSC network does is to tame from the mid-range on up, without affect the lower bass response. Where these drivers can sound overly forward (too hot in the mid-range) this adjusts that forwardness leaving the bass and treble better balanced. I find that the mid-range richness is why these drivers can sound good with acoustic instruments and especially vocal. Now many may find that the BSC circuit can reduce or suppress the dynamics and for that reason I don't really like to use them.
With the circuit you also lose a little of the speakers sensitivity, which could be an issue with low power amps. Another way to try and compensate for the natural rising response of the FE206En is to position the speakers off-axis (ie. Toe-in the speakers). The amount of speaker toe-in will vary dependent on the listening room, amplifier and personal preference.
Experiment by starting with a speaker toe-in of about 30-degrees and adjust for best results. You can also try to wall-load the speakers but pulling them closer to the rear wall to try lift the low-end. You will want to take time to find the best sepaker placement as proper placement will be rewarded with excellent acoustics. For those who will ask, the for the Fostex FE206En driver shown Figure 3 can be used. Figure 3: Zobel Circuit - Fostex FE206En Double Bass-Reflex Speaker And the sound? The Fostex FE206En double bass reflex speakers sound excellent.
I don't have a microphone setup but using the Stereophile test CD, bass starts to roll off very slowly from about 100hz until you reach about 50Hz where there is a definite rise and a there is an even bigger rise at 40Hz. That seems consistent with what is described on the enclosure plan, 'Internal volume of 45 liters tuned to approximately 50Hz (Fb). Low frequency response from around 120Hz is gently damped with a controlled peak at 50-60Hz.' This was quite a surprise! Putting your ear to the port with a 40Hz tone you can hear air rushing in and out.
The whole box sounds like it is working real hard. Because of the big bass lift offered by the double bass-reflex type enclosure, test tones at 40Hz, 31Hz, 25Hz and even 20Hz are quite audible. 20Hz is finished in terms of volume but as stated, still quite audible and surprising from a bass-shy speaker driver. While the rise at 40Hz does not make itself present in general music listening, it does add drama when listening to movies which is the primary role these speakers are intended to fill.
Because these speakers are so fast and dynamic it really is a challenge to find a subwoofer that can keep up. All-in-all, this has been a very pleasing project and to get the stippled finish I wanted with a $5 roller and tray is doubly pleasing. With only 2.5W or so on tap and the speakers at a full 96 dB / 1W /1m, there is plenty of volume. Not only do these speakers round-out the 2 channel TV end of the house but it also gives me an excellent third music listening area with quality DIY gear (don't tell the wife). Now I'm triply happy. See the thread for more information or to ask any questions.
Mark Houston, Classic Convenor, Melbourne Audio Club. UPDATE - 29 October 2012 I made up the BSC circuit using a non-inductive 2.2 ohm 5W resistor and 0.82 mH air coil inductor (a little over 2 dB of attenuation). To evaluate I listened to the speakers with and without the BSC circuit, with and without the grill covers and all possible combinations in between.
The test music was a Steinway legends/digipack which contains heavy solo piano with massive dynamics and a thundering sound. The best combination turned out to be with the BSC circuit and no grills covering the drivers. The Ashkenazy/Steinway digipack sounds its very best when played through the Oppo BDP-93 and Paris (6EM7) amplifier. On my main system which consists of a Oppo BDP-95, Silver Dragon (300B SET) and large 3-way Osborn loudspeakers the dynamics are no where near as 'startling' nor the sound as rich and natural (even raw). An interesting observation with the Fostex FE206En in Double Bass-Reflex Speakers is that there appears to be a volume related sweet-spot. Play the volume too softy and the speakers can sound quite plain and flat - play them too loudly and they start to sound compressed and the bass lacks detail while the mid-range sounds shouty.
But if you find just the right volume the speakers can really sing. Fostex FE206En Speaker Links. (Project).
I wanted to build a pair of loudspeakers that was out of the ordinary and involved a bit more thought than just throwing drivers in a box and tuning it. I didn’t, and still don’t, have a specific use for these speakers – I mostly just wanted to take the class and learn about something I enjoy. I had been looking up horn-loaded systems for almost a year and even developed a front-horn driven system for our Audio Engineering Society’s Winter Carnival statue (see ) so obviously I had a large interest in making something horn-loaded for my Transducer Theory project.
Another interesting loudspeaker concept that I’ve spent a while looking at – and one that is deeply connected with horn-loaded systems – is the small niche of “single-driver” systems. These would feature one single driver that would be responsible for producing the entire range of frequencies.
That would mean that it would have to be light enough for extremely high frequencies yet stiff and strong and powerful enough to provide enough compression for a reasonable bass response. I suppose for some who have not researched much into this sort of thing it would seem nye impossible to accomplish, but there are many speaker manufacturers who specialize in this sort of thing (i.e.
Lowther, Fostex, some of Tang Band’s, Audio Nirvana, etc.). I definitely want to start this off with letting you know that I am NOT an expert on horn design or even transmission line systems. I have done a lot of research into horn design, transmission line, and even quarter-wavelength theory designs and without trying to simplify it too much, they all try to accomplish the same thing: controlling the pressure waves induced by low frequency speaker excursion. In hindsight, I feel lucky that my design worked as well as it did because of the fact I did most of the math and designing by hand. I modeled my horn off of the but also integrated a little transmission line folding and quarter wave theory. I refuse to say that I knew entirely what I was doing, but my thought process seemed reasonable.
To build a horn you generally have to have a rather large throat expanse which is preceded by a correctly tuned compression area and is followed by a specific horn-mouth cutoff which generally dictates what frequency your horn stops functioning. Quarter-wavelength theory relies on standing waves that are a quarter the size of a normal single full-wavelength and therefore have four times the length and thus one fourth frequency (read: sort of gives you free low frequency response, ). And finally, transmission line systems are nearly always about how to fold it into a tight space. I sort of took all three of these and slapped them together like I knew what I was doing; again, luckily it worked out as well as it did. I decided on an internal width of 250mm (mostly because i like SI units as an engineer) because it would fit my driver well and from here started doing the math for my horn. Soul jazz tropicalia rar extractor youtube. I realize that horn design is all about flare-rate and is quite dependent on the thickness, but I just did a simple one-dimensional horn and simple extruded it 250mm to match.
I pretty much folded it the best I could so that it fit well; I did this while I was 3d-modeling it , so it was pretty easy to set constraints and let the program figure it out. Not much beyond this was done in terms of designing the horn. I did, however, spend a very large amount of time in Excel and on paper figuring out the right dimensions at all joints so that the horn-flare was followed as best as possible; it was hard to have an ever increasing flare without curving each board. The construction was a lot more work than I thought it would be.
It was a very involved process with many, many angles to consider and my choice of using 45° angle butt-joints was not a terrifically smart move because of the complexity and precision necessary (although it didn’t look too terrible from the front, which was my objective). I used three sheets of 4’x8′ 11-ply birch plywood and the cut-out diagram can be found on the last page of the engineering drafting drawings PDF. The most intriguing part of the build was that I put magnets behind the front baffle (completely hidden) and made a speaker grill to snap into place over so as to protect the very delicate driver; it’s very cool to have the grill just.snap. into place when you can’t even see the magnets it connects to. Another important construction step was tuning my box/horn to get the most out of it. The main things that I had to worry about for my design was sealing the box (but temporarily so that i could get in/out) and then simple reflections coming from the back inside wall. These were both alleviated through normal loudspeaker design methods which included gasket tape around the compression chamber to get better lower frequency response and fiberglass on and around the compression chamber to greatly reduce reflections.
The increase in bass response can actually be seen in the Before/After Tuning image below. I chose to use a Fostex FE206E 8″ driver mostly because it was relatively cheap and fit perfectly with what I planned to do; it was made for rear-horn applications and – unlike the higher-end FE208EΣ – didn’t require the use of a super-tweeter. There were many accounts on the internet that had great success with this driver and with a few simple modifications could be made much better (various methods of phase plugs, frame dampening, and cone modification have been tried – a google search for “” will show you a few) and so these examples of great loudspeaker systems only convinced me moreover to use the Fostex driver. Interestingly enough, however, when I went to order the FE206E from Madisound they said that it was discontinued and after a few stressful emails (I had designed my cabinet for these things after all), it turned out that they were being discontinued simply because Fostex had come out with a newer revamped version: the FE206En (yeah, the ‘n’ stands for ‘new’). Specs for this new driver can be found in the key features section below.
Some of the new changes are a much lower moving mass (15g to 12g) and a slight change in magnet strength. The new changes didn’t affect my design and were only going to improve on the sound quality. Regardless of my attempts at avoiding passive crossovers, it was probably inevitable that I ended up needing to develop a baffle step to compensate for my very fatiguing high frequencies (which is kind of ironic because they’re coming from a full-range woofer). I got general schematics off of the internet somewhere of a (pretty basic) and the modeled it in LinearX’s LEAP Crossover Shop to fine-tune it to my liking. I ended up needing to de-wind an inductor to get a better value out of it, but the end result was a very nice and flat response. Sadly, because the high frequencies dropped off so steadily off-axis I decided it would be better to have them a little higher on-axis to compensate. I’m still happy with this decision; they remain quite bright and don’t have the ear-piercing fatiguing sound as before.
Introduction Two things prompted me to chase up these drivers – the first was that the BFB was obviously being built by a lot of first time speaker builders, and that though good, some people were finding the Fostex 204 impossible to get (out of production) and the 206 difficult to get – I needed an alternative. The second reason was that the meant that many TNT readers were looking for a cheap high-efficiency speaker to match. When chasing Fostex suppliers for a reader who had emailed asking if I knew a distributor, I stumbled across the Based in the US this outfit sold only high-efficiency drivers such as Lowthers and the aforementioned Fostex, and also sold them as completed speakers or as drivers with free plans. BUT they also had just introduced their own range of drivers that were considerably cheaper than the Fostex equivalent and it was claimed, superior. Well, as a way to make the even cheaper, and to make a new 'T'-speaker this seemed to be a great opportunity so I begged a pair of the 8' drivers from David Dicks and decided to get my circular saw out. How do they compare? The AN drivers are very similar in construction to the Fostex 206.
The chassis are almost identical, the cones and centre cap seemingly the same except that here they are black paper rather than the cool cream cocoa fibre of the 206's. The big difference is the surround which is a foam roll on the Fostex and concertina'd doped cloth – the former somehow looks neater but the latter certainly has the edge in longevity if the number of drivers around with shot foam surrounds is anything to go. Round the back the other difference is even more obvious – the AN has a much bigger magnet – in fact I've never seen such a lump on the back of any driver of remotely this price. – well the two drivers are similar but the most important figures as far as this article is concerned are the QTS and the X-max as these define some of the characteristics of both drivers. Lowthers, the 206 and the AN have very, very low QTS's – 0.18 - 0.24, in the case of the AN it is at the low end of this range – 0.19.
X-max is how far the driver moves and in this case the AN is more extreme than the 206, and well in Lowther territory with an X-max of +/-1mm. So what does a very low QTS and a very small X-max mean? The latter is simple enough, it means that an 8' driver isn't going to shift much air if it can only move forward 1 mm at most. So low bass is a no-no.
But then put it in a ported box? Nope because according to our old friends Thiele-Small, a low QTS driver should not work properly in a ported box, you'll end up with a bass hump at port resonance, then a big dip followed by a nasty rising output through the upper midrange - modelling confirmed this. With the BFB the 206 has an X-max of +/-1.5 mm and a QTS of.18, and that design came with a health warning about it's PA nature and the need to toe-in to roll off the rising treble – the AN will increase the problem. The advantages of this low X-max is that the coil is underhung and will always operate linearly in that short range – i.e. Very low distortion, and a lightweight cone that is powered over such a tiny distance by such a big motor is going to be both incredibly fast and detailed, but also hugely efficient – AN claim 96 dbl and for once I think the claim if anything understated.
For some people this sort of design is as good as dynamic drivers get. So what do you do with a driver with such an extreme QTS and a low X-max? The Lowther is the granddaddy of such designs and was specifically made to work in horn systems, either front or back loaded – never in a ported box.
So everything about the AN driver screams 'horn!' And as such will be the cheapest, 8', quality driver available for such an application, though it's not an ideal cabinet for a beginner. Boxing clever? So what do AN supply with their driver? A set of plans for a ported box, and a lot of arguments about how used in this box, the driver will be far better than in a horn – ditto Lowthers. So in one foul swoop AN throw out 70 years of accepted wisdom – ho hum.
But who cares about excepted wisdom – especially as a simple rectangular ported box is exactly the ticket when it comes to getting DIY virgins on the first rung of the ladder – so I chose to follow David's instructions for his AN 2.8 speakers, a medium sized (2.8 cubic foot) floorstander with a big hole 6' across acting as a port. Every bit as simple as the BFB and of course the plans supplied made it even easier. Designed (in my case) to work with a $30 amplifier I wanted to make this speaker as cheaply as possible – money every object if you like, just to see how small a budget I could build them for – even I was surprised. Building For most people this will involve choosing a panel material, MDF, Chipboard or best of all plywood, all in 18 mm thickness. Then go to your local timber supplier and you'll find that they will almost always have a massive, wall mounted frame saw. Take the plans, stand over the guy doing it, and get him (or her) to cut all the panels out for you. These saws will cut exact 90 degrees and to an accuracy of under a mm.
So once cut, your DIY project is a simple case of cutting an 8' and a 6' hole and gluing the thing together. Now I know loads of people out there are saying “nope I need to buy off-the-shelf', but you should be ashamed of yourself. Done this way this is easier than screwing an IKEA shelf together so GET A GRIP!
To this you need to add a bit of fibreglass stuffing and of course buy banana socket and solder the wires up – again don't wimp out on me here. But as I said before I wanted to be cheap. A trip to a local DIY store found a load of pine shelving on 'special offer'. Not ideal I know, but it was good quality, would just need a coat of varnish to finish and when all's said and done it's a lot stiffer than chipboard even if it is a little inconsistent. This, the wood for my speakers, cost 15 euro. Add a euro for the varnish, glue and a few screws and I had some cabinets.
At the same DIY store they had some sound insulation panels that had been damaged, 2 euro, and I lined the box with them. I had some long fibre wool lying about (I hate fibreglass) so that went in too. Obviously I couldn't afford binding posts so I just drilled a hole in the back of the speakers and ran CAT5 (cost 10 Euro for 10 metres) cable from the drivers, through the holes and to the amp – coloured wires for +ve, white for –ve. A dab of hot melt glue to fill the hole and voila! A cable solution better than ANY binding post (i.e. No joint at all).
Lastly three rubber door-stops went under each driver (2 euro each) and I had a pair of complete speaker boxes for under 40 Euro. This 'cheapskate' approach involved compromises, but some will improve the sound, some change it, however inevitably any DIY project such as this will not sound like the fully finished speakers produced by AN – but they'll give some idea of their capabilities. Testing testing All the following was backed up using measurements (see below) which are reproduced, with explanation at the end of this article. Drivers such as this take a lot of running in, sometimes up to years so to be frank at best we're listening to partly run-in speakers. On axis 1 m results were close to what you'd expect, a bass hump, a dip then that rising output through the midrange. Treble held up incredibly well, being well up even at 16 khz, this is a driver that is truly full range in the treble, easily keeping pace with most tweeters.
To listen to, the sound was sadly what you'd expect, a very hard 'shouty' quality dominating – again as you'd expect in this respect they were worse than the BFB with a 206, to the point that I found them unacceptable. Taming the beast Why bother if they sound so bad? Well because in some ways they are very, very good. First: efficiency. I had a pair of Supravox 164's as comparison, also rated at 96 dbl and the AN's were a street ahead for the same volume setting – 4 dbl in fact. Now assuming the Supravox efficiency rating is the usual fiction and thus boosted from a true figure of say 93 dbl, then the AN's on a ported box were pumping 97 dbl at 1 khz.
This is an astonishing figure well up with a Lowther, the rising frequency response takes some of the credit but in the end it means disco volumes with a 5 watt T-amp. The other thing was that the bass was not quite what I expected, it was deeper (especially 'in-room') and very fast and tuneful. Here I wonder whether the box was in fact acting more as a mass-loaded TQWP rather than a simple ported box. But there's that rising mid/treble. The solution, at least partial, is to toe the speakers in. Look at the trace of the 30 degree off axis and that rising response is greatly reduced – treble energy is directional in all speakers, but in full-range drivers with whizzer cones it is doubly so.
That's better! With the speaker driven now by the hugely expensive Son-of-Pharao EL34 valve amp the result was much more to my liking – this in my 'b' system set up in my conservatory. Vinyl sounded pretty good, but my dear old Onkyo CD player had it's mid range laid open cruelly and again wasn't really listenable. The T-amp also worked brilliantly, it's a bit harder than the Son-of-Pharao, but that fabulous soundstage width was well to the fore. This was gratifying, the main motivation for the review (and I know other writers for TNT are also looking) is to find a cheap speaker solution worthy of the incredible capabilities of the T amp.
But as already mentioned the result was far from evenly balanced. The solution is thankfully very simple. Designs such as this can be made to work with a 'notch' filter composing of an inductor and a resistor, parallel both and put the result in-line with the positive terminal of the speaker. At low frequency the inductor offers no resistance to the signal. As frequency rises the coil begins to act as a resistor at a certain point, the larger the inductor the lower this frequency is. This resistance then parallels with the fixed resistor so that the total resistance is frequency dependent and dependent on the size of the fixed resistance.
So the larger the fixed resistor the deeper the notch, or reduction at higher frequency. The only way to do this is to experiment and by using simple screw terminal blocks you can put various 'notches' together using cheap resistors and a couple of cheapo inductors. Once you've hit on the ideal then you can break the bank and buy high quality components, in my case the 10 ohm hi-power resistor and 4.0 mH inductor cost 30e from. This took the 'sting' out of the sound and added a little warmth, but read on.
Fostex Speaker Cabinets
SERIOUS LISTENING During all this fiddling about I became more and more convinced that here we had one solution to the T-speaker problem. So now we get serious and pull the boxes into the main listening room. This room is totally different to the conservatory – it is very 'dead', walking in is almost like walking outside. There are a few resonances but they are pretty low down (primarily 40, 90 and 200 hz). The main system is £15,000 of high-end amps and turntable into speakers costing £4000 (Loth-x Polaris). Against them I ran the turntable via the Gramamp Solo SE into the new 'Super' T-amp (smoother and more bass than the original) and then into the AN's. The turntable was obviously the same but the rest of the system cost around £200:-) And the result for the AN's?
In some ways they were high-end speakers. What a thing to say but it's true. The sense of atmosphere and ambience simply stunning. Detail too was of a very high standard. Well in all these areas they bettered my own Loth-x Polaris, specialist full-range horns. This though comes with a downside. That talent was apparent at moderate listening levels, wind up the wick and the lack of travel on the driver began to roll off the bass and further exposed the midrange.
The other problem was that so revealing were the drivers that the presence of the notch filter was not entirely benign. As well as throwing away 3 dbl of output the 'notch' put a veil between you and the recording. In fact much to my surprise I found that I preferred the sound without the notch, with the speakers hard in the corners to re-enforce the bass and toed in 10 degrees to roll off the treble/upper mid. Despite the still mid-forward sound, at moderate levels this sounded pretty special. True, with the wrong material it could be wearing but if you want a taste of the high-end for £150 then a T-Amp and the AN 2.8's will certainly fit the bill, just be prepared to put some time into placing, cabling, running in and maybe notch filters.
Fostex Fe206en Review
The big 'BUT' But. All this would equally apply if you had just splashed out £500 on a pair of Lowther drivers.
The Audio Nirvanas really are Lowthers on the cheap. What that means is that these drivers, under £100 remember, will fit into any speaker designed for Lowthers. Just do a search on the internet and you'll be swamped by plans and advice for building Lowther horns, quarter-wave cabinets and Voight pipes.
They are even perfect drivers for a go at Thorsten Loesch's project. The point is that once you've bought the drivers, built one of David's ported cabinets and seen what they are capable of you may agree with David and think them the best possible cabinet. Or you may lust to try them in a big full range horn etc. And if after making such horns and falling in love with them you can easily upgrade to Lowther drivers, though I have to say that so good are the AN drivers you may not find the improvement quite what you expected. And lastly go look on Ebay and you'll frequently see people selling off old Lowther cabinets, often Acousta's, with no drivers. A decent pair can be as little as £50 – so just drop in those AN driver and you have a pair of professionally-finished horn loudspeakers.
The fact is that together with the T-amp a whole world of playing and learning is opened up for you and for the cost of a budget bookshelf speaker. So do I recommend the AN's drivers – you bet! But see them as the beginning of a journey, not necessarily a destination. Part two of this review (to follow when I get them into some horns) will document my journey with what I consider truly remarkable drivers for the money. Measurements Fig 1. You'll see three traces, all taken at 1m at the height of the driver centre. The Green trace is that of my old.
These are pretty close to being 'full range' demonstrated by that powerful bass at 30 Hz. The glitch at 40Hz is partly due to port suck-out a problem with most transmission line speakers, but one which is largely filled in in-room, otherwise they are a very good example of a speaker that measures 'flat' anechoically. The AN's don't even attempt to go there but join the party at around 60 Hz. In room this can be boosted by wall, or even corner reinforcement, but it's asking a lot for the driver to really shift a lot of air that low down. Follow the red trace which is the AN's on-axis and you'll see the predicted hole in the upper bass and then the steadily rising mid and treble output.
Though it looks good on paper to see that high treble output it is in fact misleading. In-room the trace should roll-off as with the IPL, as mid and bass is reinforced by reflections where treble is not. The result is a very bright pushy sound with no body. Now look at the blue trace.
Here the speaker is measured at 1m but with the speaker turned 30 degrees off-axis. Just look how that rising treble is controlled to give a lovely roll-off just like the IPL.
However the big hole in the upper bass is still there robbing the sound of body and warmth. Here the red trace is the same as the blue trace in Fig 1, i.e. The best so far. The other two traces are with the notch filter in place reducing upper-mid and treble output and therefore raising the lower frequencies in comparison. With the gentle notch I used you can see how in both cases the hole in the upper bass is filled to a certain extent.
Bigger notches would have a bigger effect, but perhaps not such a benign one. The Blue trace which is notch + 30 degree off-axis being the pick of the bunch. Here we see the best result of all. This is the trace of the AN's, in-room against my own Loth-x Polaris. The room is dead, the notch was removed, and the measured result is pretty good compared to the Polaris. The mid peak is still high compared to the bass, but it's bearable and playing with position would no doubt improve it.
Jan 10, 2018 - FxFactory Keygen is main software for mac user who already using any of latest graphic software, therefore these wonderful tools are available to boost your creativity. Why users like FxFactory Pro Keygen? FxFactory Pro 7 Crack Keygen is including best video enhancing and creating tools. Some of them. Fxfactory pro crack mac - I suggest you fxfactory pro 6 registration code keygen that you can simply find. FxFactory Pro 6.0.4 Crack Mac + Serial Key Full Free Download FxFactory Pro 6.0.4 Crack FxFactory Pro.
The astonishing thing is how smooth that treble rolls off (at 10 degrees off-axis) and how high it goes - note that it's better than the Polaris. It's also important to note that all these measurements are taken at pretty high levels - I'd guess 90 dbl+ and so reflect the response at realistic listening levels rather than the very low levels some measure. These three graphs show just a few of the major changes you can make in response with very little effort or cost.
But beyond that there's a mass of changes that could be done vis a vis the cabinet; materials, stuffing, ports etc and another world of different cabinet designs. Manufacturer's Comments Generally, I feel it's quite fair and thank you for the fine recommendation. Of course, I have a few comments: 1.
Lowther insists that their drivers work equally well in bass reflex OR bass horn cabinets and I agree. I think that Mr. Thiele and Mr.
Fostex Fe206en Fullrange Speaker Driver Manual
Small should be taken out and tarred and feathered. They're responsible for more, bad speaker engineering than everyone else put together. There is no magic to Qts, in my humble opinion. I have heard many, many speakers with excellent bass (in bass reflex cabinets) that the 'experts' say shouldn't work. I can't tell you why they work, they just do.
My guess is that the same geniuses who accept the Qts nonsense don't know how to properly port a bass reflex cabinet. You'll note that our tuning flies in the face of conventional wisdom here. Lowthers have plus or minus.75 mm excursion, Audio Nirvanas plus or minus 1.0 mm (total movement is 2.0 mm, not 1.0, right?), and Fostex have plus or minus 1.5 mm. In my opinion, and the folks at Lowther, the 206' 3.0 mm movement is too much to work properly in most bass horn cabinets. And we purposely chose plus or minus 1.0 mm so that the Audio Nirvanas would work equally well in either type of cabinet.and make a little more bass than the Lowther. 'Hard, shouty?!' Well, as you say, the room was perhaps too live and I'm not a big fan of CAT5 cable or the T amp.
Yes, the T is a good value for the money, but I much prefer a 'normal' amp. Lowthers and the PAudio coaxials we sell are still significantly better. But the Audio Nirvana's are the 'best I ever heard' FOR THE MONEY. And I'm glad that you agreed they actually sounded better without the notch filter. It is, of course, possible to 'tone them down' in other ways, like using different damping material. However, the best way is the cabinet material you use.
Baltic Birch ply will give the softest sound, industrial grade particle board-intermediate, and MDF will give a harder sound. Solid hardwoods (not recommended because of the inconsistency of the wood-knots, etc-will also usually give a harder sound). But I think the review is generally very fair. You may want to try the Super 8's eventually. They're even closer to Lowthers. And we're working on something new that I hope will work out and be even better. Regards, David systems used.
Vinyl: /Dynavector,. Phono stages:. CD:.
Preamp/poweramp:. Cables: FFRC and Sonic Link speaker cables.
DIY silver interconnects. Audionote silver interconnects.
Speakers:Loth-x and REL Stentor. Test records used. © Copyright 2006 - www.tnt-audio.com.
Comments are closed.
|
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |